A Literary Life

Portfolio of Kate Jonuska

Browsing the archives for the Reviews category.

Rethinking Thin (Gina Kolata)

rethinkingthin I’m not obese, but I do struggle with my weight and my body image, growing into a healthier acceptance of both as I grow older. And as I grow, I’ve become both interested in and repulsed by the fat hatred vitriolically displayed in this country, if not every country. Fat hatred like this:

In one now-classic study, Colleen Rand, an obesity researcher at the University of Florida, asked 47 formerly fat men and women whether they would rather be obese again or have some other disability. Every one of them said they would rather be deaf of have dyslexia, diabetes, bad acne or heart disease than be obese again. Ninety-one percent said they would rather have a leg amputated. Eighty-nine percent would rather be blind. One said, “When you’re blind, people want to help you. No one wants to help you when you’re fat.”

What Kolata goes on to prove quite convincingly is this fascinating book is that our hatred comes from the idea that fat can be controlled and managed, that obese individuals are just weak, undisciplined, lazy or have some other mental block or trauma that keeps them fat. They’re just not trying hard enough, right? Well, Kolata says, “Wrong.”

The data in study after study were consistent — obese people had no unique psychiatric abnormalities. Some had problems, such as anxiety, depression and mood disorders, but in every instance the psychiatric problems were just a prevalent in people of normal weight.

“Most obese people are no different than non-obese people,” Stunkard says. They are not eating because they are depressed or because they have a pathological relationship with food or to their parents. If all you had was their scores on psychological tests — if you could not actually see the people you were testing — you would not be able to decide who was fat and who was not.

Some scientists suggest an intriguing hypothesis. The origins of people’s recent weight gains may have little to do with willpower, or lack of it, or with today’s social customs to snack and eat on the run of with any other popular belief. Instead, they say, we may be a new, heavier human race and our weight may have been set by events that took place very early in life, maybe prenatally.

Scientists know that animals and people have a range of weights that they can comfortably sustain. Each person’s range is different, but any weight much above or below a person’s range is almost impossible to maintain. Scientists also know from animal studies that weight as an adult can be affected by early nutrition or infections. They even know that the brain circuits that control eating are modeled and remodeled in mice early in life and again in adolescence. Maybe, these researchers say, something happened early in life — better nutrition, vaccines to provide freedom from viral infections that plagued children of previous generations, antibiotics to cure infections like strep throat or pneumonia — that precipitated changes in the brain’s control over weight.

While she delves into some complex scientific material, Kolata manages to keep the book accessible. It’s both fascinating and heartbreaking to follow the journey of some of her interviewees, most of whom are either on or between some diet or another, their entire lives revolving around the number on the scale. It’s wonderful to see someone admit that those with a BMI considered obese are often healthier than their skinny counterparts, that there’s nothing intrinsically wrong with some extra weight. And it’s depressing to learn that, at the end of the day, science has proven that diets are ultimately unsuccessful and extreme diets can actually change your body chemistry for the worse.

Maybe the lesson is that we’ve been looking for answers to the obesity epidemic in all the wrong places. At the very least, it does not help to tell people that they are fat, much too fat, and that they just have to eat less and exercise more. After all, as (other dieters in the book) mentioned, even Oprah gained her weight back, she with all her money and her personal chef and her personal trainer, and with the whole world watching.

I’d like to think also that as the population gets fatter, there might be a rethinking of the risks of a few extra pounds. When health data have not supported alarmist cries of a medical disaster in the making, could a society perhaps let up on the beleaguered fat people?

I hope so. They can start by putting aside their preconceived notions and picking up the book.

Rating: 4.5 out of 5 stars – Hardcover book club reading

The House of the Spirits (Isabel Allende)

house-spirits I really enjoyed this book, which is fantastic mystical realism that easily matches if not surpasses that of Gabrielle Garcia Marquez. (Dern, I haven’t reviewed him here? I totally thought I’d done 100 Years of Solitude.) Except Allende is a woman, and her strong female characters are absolutely striking. Rosa the Beautiful with her sea-green hair, Clara the clairvoyant, Blanca the romantic lover and creator of mythical animals. Not that there aren’t fascinating men like the incredibly and laughably tempestuousness of Esteban, who we ultimately pity, or Blanca’s revolutionary lover who plays guitar with only two fingers. (Esteban cut off the others, of course.) The novel ranges all over the history of an unnamed South American country and could perhaps be deemed a little lengthy. But to me, the lyrical and magical story was the non-chick-lit-reading gal’s ideal summer book.

And since it’s summer and I’m so far behind in my book reviewing, I’m going to have to leave it at that. Oh well.

Rating: 4 out of 5 stars — Book club selection

Misfortune (Wesley Stace)

misfortune It was pretty good, a typical tale of an English foundling child a la Tom Jones with some gender bending complications and an ultimately predictable ending. Um… yeah. That’s all I got. It was more than six weeks ago that I read this book. I’m a little behind.

It’s summer. Cut me some slack.

Rating: 3.5 out of 5 stars – Book club vacation reading

Revolutionary Road (Richard Yates)

revolutionaryroad1 Only in America. This well-written and emotional book could only take place in America, where our lack of a defining culture has become our culture. Where we simultaneous see ourselves as “less than” older, wiser European countries and “better than” anyone else because of our flexible, dynamic youth. Frank and Amber, the novel’s main characters, are post-World War II products of that country, self-consciously part of the “greatest generation,” knowing they are destined for wonderful things yet finding themselves in a tract suburban home with two kids and dreams deferred. What follows is a two-pronged journey of self-discovery. One: That they are special enough to break out, to break the mold they see suffocating their individuality. Two: That despite their egos, they are perhaps more like the fallible and oh-so-boring-and-ordinary people around them than they would ever have guessed.

The beginning is slow, but stick with it. There are a lot of scenes sitting around a room over drinks philosophizing, and Frank definitely loves the sound of his own voice.

“This whole country’s rotten with sentimentality,” Frank said one night, turning ponderously from the window to walk the carpet. “It’s been spreading like a disease for years, for generations, until now everything you touch is flabby with it.”

“Exactly,” she said, enraptured by him.

“I mean isn’t that what’s really the matter, when you get right down to it? I mean even more than the profit motive or the loss of spiritual values or the fear of the bomb or any of those things? Or maybe it’s the result of those those things; maybe it’s what happens when all those things start working at once without any real cultural tradition to absorb them. Anyway, whatever it’s the result of, it’s what’s killing the United States. I mean isn’t it? This steady, insistent vulgarizing of every idea and every emotion into some kind of pre-digested intellectual baby food; this optimistic, smiling-though easy-way-out sentimentality in everybody’s view of life?”

“Yes,” she said. “Yes.”

“And I mean is it any wonder all the men end up emasculated? Because that is what happens; that is what’s reflected in all this bleating about ‘adjustment’ and ’security’ and ‘togetherness’ — and I mean Christ, you see it everywhere: all this television crap where every joke is built on the premise that daddy’s an idiot and mother’s always on to him; and these loathsome little signs people put up in their front yards — you ever notice those signs up on the Hill?”

“The ‘The’ signs, you mean; with people’s name in the plural? Like ‘The Donaldsons’?”

“Right!” He turned and smiled down at her in triumphant congratulation for having seen exactly what he meant. “Never ‘Donaldson’ or “John D. Donaldson’ or whatever the hell his name is. Always ‘The Donaldsons.’ You picture the whole cozy little bunch of them sitting around all snug as bunnies in their pajamas, for God’s sake, toasting marshmallows. I guess the Campbells haven’t put up a sign like that yet, but give ‘em time. THe rate they’re going now, they will.” He paused here for a deep-throated laugh. “And my God, when you think how close we came to settling into that kind of an existence.”

“But we didn’t,” she told him. “That’s the important thing.”

Wow. The ego is mind-blowing, and the sexism there more than a little apparent. Well, part of that is certainly the time period. I’d love to discuss that element of the book with someone else — whether the author’s goal is to speak to society’s and his wife’s emasculation of Frank as the source of his troubles, or perhaps that his ego and fear of emasculation is what blinds him to his real troubles. Veddy veddy interesting, IMO.

No matter what the author’s intent — in the end, it doesn’t really matter — this books is one that gets the gears turning. It sums up the frustration of the American dream so precisely and deeply, making you both love and hate it’s characters, making you cringe at their pain while you kind of root for their downfall. Yates succeeded in depicting my ambiguous feelings about this country of mine with simple but evokative prose and characters that will whisper in my ear for some time to come. Brilliant.

What ever happened to Yates, who was apparently quite popular in his time? I may have to pick up another of his novels.

Rating: 5 out of 5 stars – Buy the hardcover

Featured Home: Hollywood at home

0613cover-thumb
Broadmoor property offers luxury around every corner, including an indoor pool and an elevator
By Kate Jonuska

0613cover-insetPassing the calm and elegant campus of the Broadmoor resort and climbing up Old Stage Road to this week’s featured home, a private wrought-iron gate opens to a circular drive and presents an estate straight out of the golden age of Hollywood.

This courtyard is where Sabrina might have attended her first garden party with the Larrabees. This sweeping marble stair could have been where Norma Desmond asked Mr. DeMille for her close up. This home is where even a 21st Century family could feel the luxury and glamour of living like movie stars, down to learning the pleasure of taking a dip in the indoor pool every morning after breakfast.

“It has tons of character,” says Terrie Elwood of The Clement Team and RE/MAX Properties, who list the four-bedroom, seven-bath, 11,509-square-foot home for $1.895 million. “You’re not going to find a house like this anywhere else. It’s one of a kind.”

The lower level of stacked stone, the upper tier of stucco and the roof tiled, exquisite garden beds and retaining walls lead to the double front door. Inside, custom tile spills down the aforementioned stairway into a truly grand great room with a peaked ceiling and a wall of windows. Yards and yards of windows, looking out at a postcard perfect view of the Broadmoor nestled below and the entire city.

CLICK HERE to read the full text of this article, which published in the June 13, 2009 Springs Houses.

The Tenth Circle (Jodi Picoult)

tenth-circle Don’t look at me! It was a book club selection. No, I don’t have anything against Jodi Picoult or her passionate fans. I’m just not one of them. Picoult is first and foremost a storyteller — all about plot, plot, plot — and I’m one for the artistry of the words, so I’ve let her words go one way while my eyes roam another direction for reading material. Until this round of book club, when I read The Tenth Circle.

I was tempted not to finish it. The first half is so utterly painful, the story of a 15-year-old girl who has been date raped and all the typical victim doubt, blame and shame that I utterly loathe in the newspapers and don’t want to see rehashed on the page. (With no twists from the newspapers’ usual stories either, which might have made the story less like the deplorable thing every other teen in America seems to go through.) At the halfway point, however, the story expanded beyond the incident and I was able to muck my way through.

Expanded beyond the incident? That’s an understatement. How about ballooned out of all reckoning into graphic novels, suicide, the plight of native Americans, dog mushing races and beyond.

No personal offence to Jodi or her fans, and not to say that her other books aren’t leaps and bounds better, but on top of the experience of this one novel I’ll have to say: Sorry, I’m just not that into you. And sorry for leaving this review on such a corny note, but that stupid phrase seems to sum up my feelings completely.

Rating: 2.5 out of 5 stars – Mediocre vacation reading

Voluntary Madness (Norah Vincent)

Like most readers, I was drawn into literature by fiction, and by and large, fiction is what I read. Non fiction often reeks of the classroom, lectures, homework or obsession with a certain subject (World War II anyone?). But it’s non-fiction books like Voluntary Madness that cause me to see the beauty of the form, how the truth creatively told can be more engrossing and entertaining than any made up tale. Of course this tale — of a writer with a history of depression who voluntarily has herself committed — was one of the most engrossing autobiographical works I’ve ever experienced.

Determined but uncertain about maintaining her own mental equilibrium, Norah boldly commits herself to three different facilities up and down the socioeconomic ladder, and brings to life an astonishing range of tragic and comic inhabitants of these wards. We are with her as she navigates the byzantine rituals of the urban hospital with its overburdened staff and underattended, near indigent patient population dazed on a buffet of powerful psychotropic drugs; a calm private clinic in the Midwest, populated largely by lonely middle-class substance abusers on court referrals; and, finally, an alternative-therapy private clinic, opposed to medication with a focus on human process.

Revealing as to the human psyche, the state of mental health care in our country, the prevalence of often dangerous pharmaceuticals as well as the author’s personal history and emotional struggles, life inside the loony bin is very well rendered in a can’t-look-away-from-the-car-accident manner. Craziness fascinates us, craziness scares us, and in the end, craziness is something that we “other,” drawing a line between it and us that’s thinner than most people imagine.

But you, reader, are the sane person reading this now, and you are thinking that these people on this page are not you. By no means are they you. They are the other, put away, out of sight — and yes I, too, laugh at this expression newly now — out of mind.

It is a significant expression in this context — out of sight, out of mind. But out of whose mind? Who is out of whose mind? The lunatic is out of his mind and so we put him out of sight — not because being out of sight is necessarily good for someone who is out of his mind, but because when the lunatic is out of sight he is out of our minds. We can forget him, forget his resemblance to us, forget he is a member of the family. Thus he is made into not just “an,” but “the” other.

But as I mentioned, this, by the author’s admission, is not an objective account of anything, but becomes…

… the very persoanl account of a bona fida patient’s search for rescue and, if possible, a touch of lasting self-awareness along the way. The journalist and the patient are both me: one doing a job, or trying to; the other slouching, in her own time, toward bedlam; and each, by turns, pushing the other up and along or dragging her down.

This is non fiction that flies by, that you can’t put down, that you don’t want to be interupted from. It’s a book that anyone with experience personally or tangentially with mental issues or anyone with a healthy curiousity about mental health won’t regret picking up.

Rating: 5 out of 5 stars – Buy the hardcover

City of Bones (Cassandra Clare)

I need a little dose of silly genre fiction sometimes. The description of this book?

When fifteen-year-old Clary Fray heads out to the Pandemonium Club in New York City, she hardly expects to witness a murder — much less a murder committed by three teenagers covered with strange tattoos and brandishing bizarre weapons. Clary knows she should call the police, but it’s hard to explain a murder where the body disappears into thin air and the murderers are invisible to everyone but Clary. Equally startled by her ability to see them, the murderers explain themselves as Shadowhunters: a secret tribe of warriors dedicated to ridding the earth of demons.

I finished it in three days. I still say, “Meh.” But it was cotton candy for the brain, the mindless silliness that cleared my head between two non-fiction biographies. Judge me if you will.

Rating: 2.5 out of 5 stars – Mediocre vacation reading

Dreams from my Father (Barack Obama)

I tend to intellectualize things. Things like life, culture, social interaction, language. I like to see what our words and actions really mean, see what makes the world tick, see it for the complex system of signs and symbols it is. I should have taken more sociology in school.

I also, in the interest of full disclosure, like our current president, voted for him and eat arugula, so of course my enjoyment of this book stems partially from those preferences. But the other part of me that enjoyed this read comes from the way Obama describes himself intellectualizing as I do, dissecting himself and his place in the world in a way that both made sense and entertained me.

Half black and half white, growing up among the white part of his family, he has no one to teach him how to be black. No one can tell him how to exist in both worlds, or if that’s even possible. And so this book is the story of his journey to become comfortable in his skin and find his place — his unique, personal place — in society at large.

From his college days:

The minority assimilated into the dominant culture, not the other way around. Only white culture could be neutral and objective. Only white culture could be nonracial, willing to adopt the occasional exotic into its ranks. Only white culture has individuals. And we, the half-breeds and the college-degreed, take a survey of the situation and think to ourselves, Why should we get lumped in with the losers if we don’t have to? We become only so grateful to lose ourselvs in the crowd, America’s happy, faceless marketplace; and we’re never so outraged as when a cabbie drives past us of the woman in the elevator clutches her purse, not so much because we’re bothered by the fact that such indignities are what less fortunate coloreds have to put up with every day of the lives — although that’s what we tell ourselves — but because we’re wearing a Brooks Brothers suit and speak impeccable English and yet have somehow been mistaken for an ordinary nigger.

Don’t you know who I am? I’m an individual!

No, he’s not a Pulitzer Prize-winning genius writer, but he does know how to tell a straight-forward, descriptive and interesting story. (As a writer, I know that’s quite a feat itself. I’ve met and helped many who couldn’t.) But I wasn’t really in this book for its literary value. I wanted to know Obama’s story in detail. I wanted to know how he came to be the man he is, if he’s for real. And because I admire him, I wanted to know how he came to be the person he is today. Without being dry or boring, this book certainly quenched my thirst.

Rating: 3.5 out of 5 stars – Vacation book-club reading

Lilla’s Feast (Frances Osborne)

I love to cook, and so a friend lent me her copy of this book, which is the biography of the author’s great grandmother. While, yes, this books is a straight-forward biography — that means it’s not dramatized and obviously contains certain periods of boredom or inactivity — it was amazingly fascinating to me. I’m a history buff in addition to being a cook. I actually did my thesis on British history. And so when Lilla showed me a part of British history I’d never experienced before, well, I can only hope my life turns out as interesting to someone else as hers was to me.

Lilla was an identical twin, a girl who was born in China as the daughter of Brits engaged in trade in China. In those days, Westerners were allowed in the port towns and trade cities, basically left to their own Western ways of polo games, high tea, starched linen and Victorian morals, rolling in money with the bustling import/export business in the Orient. She’s a child of the empire, not quite belonging in China, but definitely not welcomed in London, where she was seen as a bit of a hick.

The great thing is that Lilla loves to cook. It’s her defining characteristic throughout her life. Therefore it’s no real surprise that when she was imprisoned by the Japanese for almost two years during WWII — all foreigners in Japanese-occupied China were so imprisoned — she keeps herself sane by writing out a cook book of her favorite recipes and household hints. No, I’m not going to go try any of her dishes, which are a little vague to this modern cook’s eyes and sometimes a little gross. (Ox tails, brains, etc.) But I’m not going to get over the image of her writing out a chapter of desserts during a time she was starved, forced to eat horse meat, rolled coal with mud to heat her hut and took turns cleaning out the latrines.

I really don’t understand why some people are unwilling to try reading biographies, especially when I stumble across little gems like this. Had I been born a century ago, on a different continent, with an identical twin, I think this woman could have been me and I learned a great deal from her true story of empire, food, family and belonging. (I don’t think I could take the twin part, though. I’m too opinionated sometimes to coexist with myself.)

Rating: 4 out of 5 stars – Book club selection

Archives